Skip to content

THERP

June 10, 2014

THERP

The material in this post is extracted from Chapter 8 of the book Plant Design and Operations.

Human error rates can be modeled using a technique known as THERP (Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction). The method uses Boolean logic to model and predict human error rates. Hence it can be integrated Probabilistic Risk Assessment techniques — particularly Fault and Event Trees — topics that are discussed in depth in Process Risk and Reliability Management. A THERP analysis is most effective when the tasks are routine and proceduralized, and when the persons involved are not under stress. THERP can also be used for Event Tree modeling. For example, an initiating event could be an emergency situation such as a leak of a hazardous chemical. Items in the Event Tree that could incorporate human error include: recognition that a leak has occurred, identifying the nature of the leak, and using the correct emergency response equipment. When building a THERP model errors are categorized and then assigned a probability. For example, an operator may be required to close a valve. Potential errors include:

  1. Failing to close the valve;
  2. Closing the wrong valve; and
  3. Partially closing the valve.

If the likelihood for these errors is low then they can simply be added together to obtain the overall error rate, corresponding to the OR Gate in a Fault Tree. For example, if the respective likelihoods for the above errors are 0.01, 0.03 and 0.03 then the overall error rate is 0.07 (excluding second order terms). Broadly speaking, errors can be classified as either those of commission (doing something wrong) or omission (not doing something that should have been done). Errors of commission can then be divided into the following categories:

  • Errors of Selection – error in the use of controls or equipment;
  • Errors of Sequence – required action is carried out in the wrong order;
  • Errors of Timing – task is executed before or after when required; and
  • Errors of Quantity – inadequate amount or in excess.

The error rates can be modified with a “recovery factor” which allows for corrective action to be taken before the consequences of the error affects the overall system performance (corresponding to the Fault Tree AND Gate). For example, if there is a 30% chance that the operator will take immediate corrective action on closing the wrong valve then the error rate for the second item in the above list falls to (0.03 * 0.7), or 21%. A data base of Human Error Probabilities (HEPs) is needed in order to develop the model. Three sources exist for the collection of data suitable for the generation of HEPs. They are:

  1. Data derived from relevant operating experience;
  2. Data derived from experimental research; and
  3. Data derived from simulator studies.

As with any Fault Tree approach the results of the analysis are used to identify those activities which contribute the most to system failure (“The Important Few”) and to take corrective actions to reduce the overall failure rate. Although THERP provides a useful way of integrating human error in Probabilistic Risk models, it does have two drawbacks. First, it is time-consuming and expensive to build a credible data base of human error rates. And, related to this problem, the human beings are not equipment items that fail in some statistically measurable manner. The action of a human depends on many impossible-to-classify issues such as whether a person has just had a domestic dispute.

Advertisements
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: